|Logic and Colour
Department of Linguistics
In the course of history, there have been many attempts to capture patterns of perceptual colour opposition in diagrammatic representations. In the first lecture, we shall trace some of the history of these attempts and argue that the postulated patterns of opposition between cardinal colours – represented by such lexical items as red, green, blue, yellow, black, white, magenta and cyan – , though dated in several respects, are in their basics sursprisingly similar to the relational pattern that has been proposed between the logical operators that define predicate logic, represented by the lexical items all/every, some/any, no. We shall see that some of the historical debates in both domains were actually variants the same discussion about two different realms of the natural language lexicon.
In this lecture we turn to the formal evidence showing that Wittgenstein’s intuition about a logic of colour relations is to be taken near-literally. We will show with a Smessaert-type bitstring algebra that definitions for logical operators are transferable to basic colour categories and describe relations such as those between complementary colours, etc. in formal detail. We will go into linguistic data, where the pattern imposes a distinction between natural and non-natural lexicalization (such as *nand and *nall in the lexis of logic; cyan and magenta in the field of colour terms)
In the third part, we will argue in favour of an internalist view on colour and on what are called linguistic functional categories. It will be shown that the pattern established is extendable to other functional domains such as morphological tense distinctions in English, person and number, as well as to several non-functional categories (Seuren & Jaspers 2014).
R. Blanché. Note sur les relations d’ordre. Revue Philosophique, Octobre-décembre(4):431–433, 1975.
R. Blanché. Quantity, modality, and other kindred systems of categories. Mind, 61(243):369–375, July 1952.
R. Blanché. Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria, 19:89–130, 1953.
R. Blanché. Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation syst ́ematique des concepts. Vrin, Paris, 1969.
R. Declerck. The grammar of the English tense system: a comprehensive analysis. Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.
L. Horn. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles, 1972.
L. Horn. A Natural History of Negation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1989.
L. Horn. Hamburgers and truth: Why gricean inference is gricean. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16(454-471), 1990.
L. R. Horn. Histoire d’*o: Lexical pragmatics and the geometry of opposition. In J..-Y. Béziau and G. Payette, editors, The Square of Opposition: A General Framework for Cognition, pages 393–426, Bern, 2012. Lang.
P. Jacoby. A triangle of opposition in aristotelian logic. The New Scholasticism, 24:32–56, 1950.
D. Jaspers. Operators in the Lexicon – On the Negative Logic of Natural Language. LOT Dissertation Series 117. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics / LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics, Utrecht, 2005.
D. Jaspers. Logic of colours in historical perspective. HUB Research Paper, (3), 2011.
D. Jaspers. Logic and colour. Logica Universalis, 6(1-2):227–248, 2012.
A. Sesmat. Logique - II. Les raisonnements, la logistique. Hermann, Paris, 1951.
P. Seuren. The logic of thinking. Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, Mededelingen van de afdeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, 65(9), 2002.
P. Seuren. The natural logic of language and cognition. Pragmatics, 16(1):103–138, 2006.
P. Seuren. Language from within, volume Vol. 2. The logic of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.
P. Seuren and D. Jaspers. Logico-cognitive structure in the lexicon. Language, 90(3):607–643, 2014.
H. Smessaert. On the 3d visualisation of logical relations. Logica Universalis, 3:303– 332, 2009.
S. Vikner. Reichenbach revisited: one, two or three temporal relations? Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 19:81–95, 1985.
G. Von Wright. An Essay in Modal Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1951.