How
to algebraize your logic and how to logify your algebras Josep Maria Font University of Barcelona - Spain |
|||||||
Session 1: The paradigm of algebraizability (from Boole to Blok and Pigozzi, through Lindenbaum and Tarski). Algebraic semantics and equivalent algebraic semantics. What is a logic? What does it mean to algebraize it? Kinds of algebraizability. Can one show that some logic is not algebraizable? What does one get from kowing that some logic is algebraizable? Bridge theorems. Session 2: Not every logic is algebraizable, so what? Matrix semantics and the protoalgebraic hierarchy. Bridge theorems. Not every logic is protoalgebraic, so what? Generalized matrices, atlases, and their dual view. Full models. Transfer properties and bridge theorems. Session 3: Algebraization of Gentzen systems. Algebraizability of substructural logics. Models of structural Gentzen systems and full adequacy. Logification of certain varieties through sentential logics and through Gentzen systems. Extended notions of regularity. References 1) Blok, W. and Pigozzi, D. "Abstract Algebraic Logic and the
Deduction Theorem", Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, to
appear. |
|||||||
Abstract
algebraic logic (AAL) deals with the algebraic study of logics in a way
that views both terms "algebraic" and "logic" under a general perspective.
It studies different abstract processes of assigning a class of algebras
to a given logic, and the general properties of these processes, their
limitations and their different variants or enhancements, instead of
focusing on the resulting class of algebras for a particular logic. AAL
crystalized in the eighties and nineties as an evolution from the
so-called "Polish"-style general approach to sentential logics with
algebraic means, after the fundamental contributions of researchers such
as Czelakowski, Blok, Pigozzi, Herrmann, Font, Jansana and
Verdú. The clarification of the different ways in which a logic can be algebraized has thrown light on the behaviour of several logical systems that are not amenable to the standard settings, but it has also clarified the deep roots of the algebraic properties of classical logic. In its recent developments AAL has proven useful for the study of non-monotonic and substructural logics, and of other Gentzen-style systems formulated with hypersequents or many-sided sequents. It does also provide definite criteria to clarify in which sense a logic is said to correspond to a given class of algebras, and it has stimulated a reflection on the issue of what a logic is. This tutorial is conceived as a reading guide of the available scholarly material. AAL is a mathematical theory, and by now it is deep and technically involved, with several ramifications and its own terminology and notation. A 3-session tutorial can only show the essentials, that is, the "what" and the "why", but not much of the "how". An effort will be made to provide enough examples of logics and of classes of algebras and of their treatment under several of the AAL paradigms. |
|||||||